menu filler

Bradley W. Caldwell


Bradley W. Caldwell

 

Bradley Caldwell
bcaldwell@caldwellcc.com
Direct Line: (214) 888-4840
2101 Cedar Springs Rd.
Suite 1000
Dallas, Texas 75201

Education
University of Texas School of Law
J.D., 2003.

Texas A&M University
BSEE. 2000



Brad Caldwell is a principal at Caldwell Cassady & Curry. He is a trial lawyer who focuses on patent infringement and complex commercial litigation for both plaintiffs and defendants. Mr. Caldwell’s courtroom success before judges, juries, and arbitration panels includes cases involving digital media, telecommunications and computer networking, data security, computer imaging, medical devices, enterprise software, banking technology, and oilfield services.

Mr. Caldwell consistently is recognized by his peers in the legal community based on his work in patent disputes and business litigation. He has been named one of the Best Lawyers in Dallas by his legal peers and the publishers of D Magazine since 2016 and an Intellectual Property Trailblazer by the publishers of The National Law Journal. He was named “Litigator of the Week” by The American Lawyer magazine two different times in 2016 after scoring record-setting patent infringement verdicts against Apple Inc. Mr. Caldwell also was one of five lawyers nationwide and the only Texas attorney to be named to the Law360 2017 Rising Stars list in the intellectual property category. The publishers of Texas Lawyer newspaper also named him on the 2017 Lawyers on the Rise list for his work in patent cases

In addition to earning a spot in The Best Lawyers in America since 2016, Mr. Caldwell has been named one of the Lawdragon 500 Leading Lawyers in America since 2014. He also has earned selection to the annual Texas Super Lawyers list since 2015 and the affiliated Texas Rising Stars list (2006-2009, 2011-2015) based on his work in patent cases. His role in helping a client win a $250 million patent verdict was featured in a 2009 profile article published by Super Lawyers magazine. In 2012, Mr. Caldwell was named a leading U.S. patent litigator by the publishers of The Legal 500, and he previously was honored by D Magazine in its annual listing of the Best Lawyers in Dallas Under 40.

Prior to founding Caldwell Cassady & Curry, Mr. Caldwell was a principal at McKool Smith. At the University of Texas School of Law, he received the Dean’s Achievement Award in Patent Litigation. Before attending law school, Mr. Caldwell earned a degree in electrical engineering from Texas A&M University. He now serves as a member of the electrical engineering department’s External Advisory & Development Council. During an externship from Texas A&M, Mr. Caldwell worked for a year as an electrical engineer at the Central Intelligence Agency in Langley, Virginia, where he obtained a top-secret security clearance and was awarded multiple merit-based citations.

Firm Honors

  • Texas Intellectual Property Litigation Department of the Year (2017) – Texas Lawyer
  • #1 U.S. Plaintiffs’ Patent Firm – IAM Patent 1000 – The World’s Leading Patent Professionals
  • Top 100 U.S. Verdicts of 2016 (3 verdicts) – The National Law Journal/VerdictSearch
  • #1 Texas Intellectual Property Verdict (2016) – The National Law Journal/VerdictSearch
  • Top 50 Recoveries (2015-2016) – The National Law Journal
  • Best Law Firms (2017) – The Best Lawyers in America/U.S. News & World Report
  • Top Patent Damage Awards Won Since 2000 (2015) – Law360
  • Top 100 U.S. Verdicts of 2015 – The National Law Journal/VerdictSearch
  • #1 Texas Intellectual Property Verdict (2015) – The National Law Journal/VerdictSearch

 

Representative Matters

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Apple Inc.
Mr. Caldwell served as lead trial counsel on behalf of Cellular Communications Equipment LLC in a patent infringement lawsuit against Apple Inc. over a network technology patent. Following a trial in September 2016 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, jurors awarded a $22 million verdict in favor of CCE. The award represented a running royalty on Apple’s infringement through March 2016.

Smartflash LLC matters against Apple, Samsung, HTC, Google, and Amazon
Mr. Caldwell is the lead trial lawyer for Smartflash in its patent infringement actions involving Smartflash’s data storage and access system patents, which are infringed by various devices and functionality involved in the operation of Apple’s iTunes Store and App Store, Google Play, and the Amazon Appstore. In February 2015, following the first trial in these matters, a jury found that Apple willfully infringes Smartflash’s patents with its iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch products, found that the patents were not invalid, and awarded Smartflash $532,900,000 in compensatory damages for Apple’s infringement.

VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc.
Mr. Caldwell represents VirnetX as lead trial counsel in the company’s ongoing litigation against Apple for infringement of VirnetX’s network security patents by Apple’s FaceTime, iMessage, and VPN On Demand features. In the first trial against Apple in 2012, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found VirnetX’s patents valid and awarded a $368 million verdict based on Apple’s infringement. After the case was sent back for a new trial on damages, it was consolidated with a subsequent lawsuit covering newer products that Apple marketed after the first trial. In the consolidated trial, Mr. Caldwell and other attorneys at Caldwell Cassady & Curry won again; securing a $625 million verdict for VirnetX in February 2016 after another Eastern District jury found that Apple continued to infringe VirnetX’s patents following the first trial. The jury also found that Apple’s infringement was willful regarding FaceTime and VPN on Demand. The court later vacated its order to consolidate the matters and set the cases covering newer and older products for two separate jury trials. In the first new trial heard in October 2016, Mr. Caldwell helped VirnetX win once again, securing a $302 million verdict against Apple. The remaining jury trial has not been scheduled.

Dr. Robert Morley v. Square Inc.
Mr. Caldwell represents Washington University in St. Louis Professor Robert Morley in his suit against Square, Inc., Jack Dorsey, and Jim McKelvey for patent infringement and breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of trade secrets, exclusion of Dr. Morley from Square, and related business torts after Dr. Morley invented the famous Square credit card reader and helped create the company. Mr. Caldwell also represents Dr. Morley in related inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. The court case is pending in the Eastern District of Missouri and is set for trial in 2016.

VirnetX, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
Mr. Caldwell represented VirnetX as trial counsel in two patent infringement actions against Microsoft involving VirnetX’s network security patents. Mr. Caldwell and the others on the team inherited the first Microsoft case from another law firm after the close of discovery and with relatively little time to prepare for trial, but they were nevertheless successful in trial. The jury found Microsoft infringed willfully, found that the patents were valid, and awarded $105,750,000 to VirnetX. The case then settled while VirnetX’s request for a permanent injunction was pending. In a subsequent matter involving additional allegations of infringement by Microsoft, Microsoft settled with VirnetX before trial.

Summit 6 LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Facebook Inc., et al.
Mr. Caldwell represents Summit 6 in a patent infringement action involving Summit 6′s patents, which cover the processing (e.g., compression or resizing) of images prior to transmission. Facebook, Blackberry, and Photobucket settled before trial. Samsung did not, and the dispute between Summit 6 and Samsung went to trial. In early 2013, a jury found in favor of Summit 6 on infringement and validity and awarded $15,000,000 to Summit 6 to compensate it for Samsung’s infringement.

Medtronic, Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp.
Mr. Caldwell, while at his former firm, has represented Medtronic in multiple patent infringement actions involving coronary catheterization, stent design, and drug-eluting stent technology pending in the Eastern District of Texas and elsewhere. In Medtronic, Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp., Mr. Caldwell represented Medtronic in a jury trial that resulted in a $250,000,000 verdict in Medtronic’s favor. The lawsuit settled after judgment was entered by the district court.

Wyeth and Cordis Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc., et al.
While at his previous law firm, Mr. Caldwell represented Medtronic in defense of a patent infringement lawsuit pending in the District of New Jersey where local companies Wyeth and Cordis accused Medtronic of infringing patents pertaining to the use of the drug rapamycin (now commercially known as sirolimus) to treat restenosis—re-narrowing of an artery following an angioplasty procedure. The district court granted Medtronic’s motion for summary judgment invalidating the asserted patents, resulting in a complete victory for Mr. Caldwell’s client.

Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. BJ Services Corp.
Mr. Caldwell successfully represented Halliburton as trial counsel in an arbitration proceeding against BJ Services Corporation (now a part of Baker Hughes, Inc.) in a case pertaining to infringement of three Halliburton patents in the field of hydraulic fracturing. While at his previous firm, Mr. Caldwell tried the case before a three-judge panel from the American Arbitration Association.

i2 Technologies, Inc. (now JDA Software Group) v. Oracle Corp.
At his previous firm, Mr. Caldwell represented i2 in a patent infringement action involving supply chain planning and application management patents. The parties reached a settlement agreement after the pretrial conference and before the beginning of trial.

JP Morgan Chase & Co. v. Affiliated Computer Services Inc.
Mr. Caldwell, while at his previous firm, defended ACS in a patent infringement lawsuit brought by JPMorgan Chase in the District of Delaware, focusing on three stored-value card patents asserted by JPMorgan. Before the close of discovery, JPMorgan unilaterally dropped all three of those patents from the lawsuit in the face of compelling noninfringement, invalidity, and inequitable conduct defenses developed by Mr. Caldwell and the team.