Direct Line: (214) 888-4841
2121 N. Pearl St.
Dallas, Texas 75201
- EducationSouthern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law
J.D., cum laude, 2004.
SMU Law Review Association
Staff Editor, 2002-2003.
SMU Law Review Association
Technology Editor, 2003-2004
The University of Texas
B.A., Sociology, 2000
Jason Cassady is a principal at Caldwell Cassady & Curry. He is a trial lawyer who focuses on intellectual property litigation and complex commercial litigation. Mr. Cassady has served as trial counsel or lead trial counsel in multiple federal trials, including courtroom victories in patent cases involving such diverse technologies as secure computer networking, integrated circuits, video game controllers, and computer operating systems.
He also has represented parties on both sides of the aisle in areas such as drill bit technology, balloon angioplasty catheters, and electronic checking. In his pro bono practice, Mr. Cassady has tried and won numerous criminal defense cases alleging assault, resisting arrest, and evading arrest.
Mr. Cassady’s work as trial counsel includes more than seven different jury awards ranked among the “Top 100 Verdicts” in the United States.
Consistently recognized for his work in intellectual property litigation, Mr. Cassady has earned selection to the 2017 edition of The Best Lawyers in America; one of the 2016 Best Lawyers in Dallas by the publishers of D Magazine; and one of 20 Texas Lawyers on the Rise by the publishers of Texas Lawyer newspaper in 2016. He also is a regular honoree on the annual Texas Super Lawyers Rising Stars list of the state’s leading young attorneys, including being ranked among the state’s Top 100 in 2017.
Mr. Cassady is licensed to practice before all Texas state courts, the U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Southern, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Prior to founding Caldwell Cassady & Curry, Jason was a principal at McKool Smith.
- Texas Intellectual Property Litigation Department of the Year (2017) – Texas Lawyer
- #1 U.S. Plaintiffs’ Patent Firm – IAM Patent 1000 – The World’s Leading Patent Professionals
- Top 100 U.S. Verdicts of 2016 (3 verdicts) – The National Law Journal/VerdictSearch
- #1 Texas Intellectual Property Verdict (2016) – The National Law Journal/VerdictSearch
- Top 50 Recoveries (2015-2016) – The National Law Journal
- Best Law Firms (2017) – The Best Lawyers in America/U.S. News & World Report
- Top Patent Damage Awards Won Since 2000 (2015) – Law360
- Top 100 U.S. Verdicts of 2015 – The National Law Journal/VerdictSearch
- #1 Texas Intellectual Property Verdict (2015) – The National Law Journal/VerdictSearch
- Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Apple Inc.Mr. Cassady represented Cellular Communications Equipment LLC in a patent infringement lawsuit against Apple Inc. over a network technology patent. Following a trial heard in September 2016 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, jurors found Apple to be a willful infringer and awarded a $22 million verdict in favor of CCE. The award represented a running royalty on Apple’s infringement through March 2016.
- Smartflash LitigationThe firm represented Smartflash in its patent infringement actions involving the company’s data storage and access system patents against Apple’s iTunes store and the Google Play feature in Samsung and HTC products.
- VirnetX, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Caldwell Cassady & Curry represents VirnetX in the company’s patent infringement litigation against technology giant Apple Inc. In a dispute that the Eastern District of Texas trial court said has attained Dickensian proportions, Caldwell Cassady & Curry has helped VirnetX win favorable verdicts in five separate trials where each jury awarded over $300 million in damages.
In late 2012, we helped VirnetX win a $368 million verdict when a federal jury determined that Apple had infringed four VirnetX patents to produce the VPN On Demand and FaceTime features in the popular iPhone and other Apple products.
After the case was sent back for a new trial on damages, we won again by securing a $625 million verdict for VirnetX in February 2016 after jurors in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas found that Apple continued to infringe VirnetX’s patents following the first trial to produce the FaceTime and re-designed VPN On Demand features. The jury also found that Apple’s infringement was willful regarding FaceTime and VPN on Demand.
The court later vacated its order to consolidate the matters and set the cases for two separate jury trials focusing on different versions of Apple features.
In the first new trial heard in September 2016 pertaining to the earlier generations of products, we helped VirnetX win a $302 million verdict against Apple before a new Eastern District jury. The verdict was entered as a $439.7 million judgment in September 2017 and affirmed on appeal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
In the second new trial heard in April 2018 addressing the newer generations of products, a different Eastern District jury awarded a unanimous verdict of $502.6 million in favor of VirnetX after finding Apple’s infringement was willful. After that verdict was sent back for a new trial on damages, a final trial was held in Fall 2020, again in the Eastern District of Texas. In that trial, we secured a $502.8 million jury verdict following the Federal Circuit’s affirmance of the 2018 finding that Apple’s VPN On Demand in iOS versions 7.0 and later infringed VirnetX’s patents. The district court later denied Apple’s request for a new trial and entered the jury’s verdict in favor of VirnetX as a final judgment.
- VirnetX v MicrosoftAs lead trial counsel, Mr. Cassady represented VirnetX in its multi staged patent litigation and licensing with Microsoft. In 2011, a jury awarded VirnetX $105,000,000 in its verdict and found that Microsoft’s infringement had been willful. That case settled after VirnetX moved for a permanent injunction. In subsequent litigation involving additional infringement assertions, Microsoft settled before trial.
- Bedrock Computer Techs. v. Google Inc.Mr. Cassady, as trial counsel, represented Bedrock in a suit filed against Google for patent infringement involving methods for efficiently removing expired data from information storage and retrieval systems. The case settled shortly after the jury awarded $5 million in favor of Bedrock.
- VirnetX v. Mitel et alAs lead counsel, Mr. Cassady represented VirnetX in matters against Siemens, Mitel, and Avaya regarding security technology for IP phones and other IP related communications. Siemens, Mitel, and Avaya settled litigation involving patent infringement before trial.
- Dr. Robert Morley v. Square Inc.Mr. Cassady represents Dr. Morley in his suit against Square, Inc., Jack Dorsey, and Jim McKelvey for patent infringement and breach of joint-venture and fiduciary duty, misappropriation of trade secrets, and for exclusion of Dr. Morley from Square. Dr. Morley revolutionized the mobile payment industry with his invention of the Square card reader. A trial in the Eastern District of Missouri is scheduled for mid-2016.
- Anascape, Ltd. v Nintendo et al.Mr. Cassady represented Anascape in its patent infringement lawsuit against Microsoft and Nintendo involving video game controller technology. After a two week trial in the Eastern District of Texas, Anascape obtained a jury verdict against Nintendo. Microsoft and Anascape reached a confidential settlement on the eve of trial.
- Opti Inc. v. Apple Inc.Mr. Cassady, as trial counsel, represented Opti, Inc. in a patent infringement suit against Apple regarding its patent regarding a computer operation that enables a “pre-snooping” function designed to allow for the more efficient transfer of data. A jury found that Apple willfully infringed Opti’s patent and awarded $19 million in damages. The case settled during appeal.
- Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Boston Scientific et al.Mr. Cassady and others from McKool Smith won a substantial jury verdict on behalf of Medtronic in a patent infringement lawsuit alleging infringement of Medtronic patents covering the design of balloon angioplasty catheters and polymers used to build those catheters. This lawsuit settled after judgment was entered by the district court.
- Varel International Independent LP.Attorneys at the firm have represented and continue to represent Varel in various patent and commercial litigation matters, including defending Varel against ReedHycalog’s allegations of patent infringement.
- US Synthetics Corporation.Represented US Synthetics in patent infringement litigation regarding diamond cutter technology. The case settled before trial.
- Eckhard U. Alt v. Medtronic, Inc.Represented Medtronic in patent infringement litigation related to cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators. The case settled before trial.
- Medtronic v. CordisRepresented Medtronic asserting patents protecting cardiovascular stents. The case settled before trial.
- Nortel Networks.Represented Nortel Networks in patent infringement litigation related to telecommunications software and hardware. The matter settled before trial.
- American Video Graphics v. Electronic Arts, Inc., et al., American Video Graphics v. Hewlett-Packard, et al., American Video Graphics v. Microsoft, American Video Graphics v. Sony Online Entertainment Inc., et al.Represented AVG in multiple suits involving Computer graphics and operating system software. Favorable settlements were reached in all matters.